Join for FREE | Take the Tour Lost Password?
[x]

deviantART

 
About Me Member General Fiction Writer imdead-goawayMale/United States Recent Activity Deviant for 2 Years
Needs Premium Membership
Statistics 318 Deviations
177 Comments
4,308 Pageviews

Newest

Kauftheil & Wat: A project in progress (finall

Sun Nov 8, 2009, 9:36 AM
  • Mood: Bemused
  • Listening to: Beatles Anthology
  • Reading: Newsweek
  • Watching: Nuttin'
  • Playing: the game. The one that will take me to my hand.
  • Eating: my nails
  • Drinking: in the morning.
So, Steven (aka Mr. Wat)([link]) and I ([link]) have ffffinally taken the initiative to start putting together a project!
We decided to give a big Fuck You to our middle-school-born dreams of creating games and animations for a while, and we're working on comics instead.

This is a script I wrote a while back, during the summer. We were going to make an animation of this, as well as a few others like it, but that idea, like all the rest, never really left the ground for too long.
I wrote, Steven drew.
1. [link]
2. [link]

toD is a character that premiered in [link] - a flash Steven made based off of a sarcastic comment I made about one of his very early, very simple flash experiments.

More to come, and we'll probably put 'em all on a website eventually.

deviantID

Devious Info

  • Current Residence: Who knows?
  • Interests: Writing, tea
  • Favourite band or musician: Pink Floyd
  • Favourite genre of music: Classic Rock
  • Favourite artist: Van Gogh
  • Favourite poet or writer: Richard Brautigan
  • Favourite photographer: Tung Dao

deviantART Community Board

[x]

Comments


:iconclaiming-cordova:
Hey Daniel. I made a new account, and will no longer be using this one. Here is a link to my new account if you want to add me:

[link]

--
"In all my life, I've never known someone like you. And I hope I know no one else like you for the rest of my life. Because if I ever have to lose you, I know I couldn't do it more than once."
:icondanmai:
When Satan and Jesus cross, T.
Your buds want tea.
:iconimdead-goaway:
You do realize when you leave more than, like, two messages at a time, I don't read any of them, right?

--
Fuck it all, fuck it all.


Fuck, fuck, fuck
it all.
:icondanmai:
So when did you get so stiff? Just "exchanging wordplay"; the spaces were blank.
:iconimdead-goaway:
You don't have to be obnoxious about it.

--
Fuck it all, fuck it all.


Fuck, fuck, fuck
it all.
:icondanmai:
Who's da Freud, fuck Freud. Sorry Father-complex, consider me trolled. Now to go write a diary entry about the horrible display my ego has made this day.
:icondanmai:
Garbage in, garbage out.
:iconapproximatebiostat:
What you said is false: Ethics and morality are'nt philosophy about what is fun or painful, it's about what is rightious and what is wiked and unkind, especially in a spiritual sense.
:iconimdead-goaway:
Why don't you take a class in philosophy, sociology, or ethics and get some valid arguments to prove me wrong?
Oh, that's right... you don't take college classes. You're still a kid in a sixth grade English class. Not only that, it seems to me that you are stuck in a level of reasoning even below your own age group.
You seem to hardly have crossed into Psychologist Jean Piaget's Concrete Operational stage, which takes place from the ages 7-12, and some believe sooner, where children cannot explain, without concrete examples, concepts such as truth, honesty, and justice. This means they cannot develop their own ideas on these subjects, as you seem to be completely cemented in your parents', and maybe at a stretch your immediate environment's sense of morality. With the stubbornness and ignorance you display, I'd put put you in the lower age group of that stage.
If you want to argue ethics, develop some of your own before you try whining in people's ears.

--
Fuck it all, fuck it all.


Fuck, fuck, fuck
it all.
:iconapproximatebiostat:
I'll give an example or two or more then. Say someone says "Hey, does anyone like Super smash bros?", and someone else, whith the intention of hurting the other person's feelings, says "You're a dork, haha!". Because he was called a dork, the first speaker would have their self-esteem and feelings be hurt. Since one's tastes are not related to legal laws, or to the ten commandments, they have no relation to whether or not a person deserves to ahve their feelings hurt or not. Therefore, insulting that person based off their tastes is a cural, morally unjustifiable act.

Another example is if a girl has this necklace she really likes, and someone takes it away without her permission. Imagien this hurts the theft victim's feelings without her having done anytihng illegal or sinful, which are the only things that would make her deseve it. In that situation taking the necklace would also be an morally unjustifiable act.

Site Map